Forecasts

What happens next, by when, and how sure we are

Probability is how likely an outcome is by its deadline. Confidence, shown as bars, is how strong the evidence behind that number is. Estimates move only when verified evidence does, and every question is scored when it resolves.

Open questions
Due in 12 months
Expected to happen
Confidence
Resolved

AGI Observatory

When AGI arrives, and who is leading

AGI here means AI that can do the work of an AI researcher, end to end. We do not guess the date ourselves: we combine the leading published forecasts with a measured trend, by a fixed rule, every morning.

Our estimate

What the estimate is built on

Each bar runs from today to the date a source expects. Our estimate is the middle of the counted sources.

How the estimate has moved

What changed, and when

    The forecasts behind it

    Counted sources set the estimate. The others are shown for context.

      Who holds the frontier records

      The best published result on four tests of frontier AI, and who set it.

      TestBest resultHeld by

      Companies and countries

      Records each holds now, and records set in the last 12 months.

        United States and China, best result on each test

        TestUnited StatesChina

        Timeline

        Milestones, records, releases and forecast changes, newest first.

          Steps to watch

          Dated questions on the forecast board that would show AGI getting closer, scored when they resolve.

            Every question on the board
            How the observatory works

            Board

            Every question

            Revisions

            How expectations changed

            Every change is a move from one probability to another, with the reason and the evidence. Nothing is overwritten.

              Track record

              Are the probabilities any good?

              If Laurenceo says 70%, it should be right about 70% of the time, and sharper than a coin flip.

              Scores

              Reliability

              Where the open questions sit

              A board with everything near 50% would say little; one with nothing between 5% and 30% would be overconfident.

              Method

              How the board works

              Full method
              Probability
              How likely the outcome is by its deadline, from 0.5% to 99.5%. In words: Very unlikely (10% or less), Unlikely (11 to 35%), Toss-up (36 to 65%), Likely (66 to 90%), Very likely (over 90%).
              Confidence
              How much to trust the probability, computed only from the evidence, never from the probability. Points for sourced facts (1 for one, 2 for two or three, 3 for four or more), 2 or more independent publishers (+1), a sourced fact from the last 180 days (+1), a measured trend with enough points (+1), that trend agreeing within 20 points (+1, or -1 when more than 35 apart), a deadline within a year (+1, or -1 beyond two years), more speculation than fact (-1). High at 6 or more, Medium at 4 or 5, Low at 3 or less. A probability of 10% or less, or over 90%, on Low confidence is flagged.
              Movement
              A change of 2 percentage points or more is an update and needs a verified fact and a written reason. Smaller changes are ignored. One day's move is capped.
              Evidence
              A fact is stated in a source the pipeline retrieved and checked, and links to it. Inference is Laurenceo reasoning from facts; speculation is flagged. Every question shows evidence against as well as for.
              Trend test
              Where a question depends on a measured series, four growth shapes are fitted and weighted by support. The fitted probability is a reference, not the forecast.
              Resolution and scoring
              An event resolves YES on a verified source, and NO after its deadline plus 14 days. Resolved questions are scored with Brier and log scores. A daily ledger of every probability is stored and cannot be overwritten.

              A Laurenceo research system by Jorai Laurenceo, produced autonomously by an AI research pipeline built on Claude and checked automatically before publication. Briefings are not reviewed by a person before they publish. Editorial standards